Finally arrived in Kona after a long but reasonably relaxing 2 days of travel. It gave me lots of time to work on my new training Database and try out some ideas I’ve had.
I am a firm believer that consistency over a period of months, years is what really is the key to Ironman success. It out trumps volume to a point. By this a mean consistent week in week out periods of moderate volume are better than doing some monster weeks and then being a couch potato for one. I’ve been spending a lot of time recently moving all my training data into a database I’ve built. This harps back to my old life as a data modeller and programmer and it’s given me a great deal of pleasure. I remember that I did actually enjoy my work!
Having my data in this form and allowed a load of “Data Mining” – I’ve seen some interesting things and I may blog on that at a future date. It has allowed me to experiment with trying to measure and track “consistency”. I wanted to try and capture the essence of what I feel is required and back test it against my performances. A big part of this is to be able to start to use this with my athletes. This is very similar to the idea of monotony (standard deviation of daily load) and strain (average load divided by monotony) which I track. There are problems with this
- I don’t want to look at consistency on a daily basis. How the week is split up doesn’t matter so much as much as overall volume for the week. NB: this is not a fact, it’s just my opinion that I will try and test against my data
- I’m saying consistency is good so I low standard deviation is good. For what every reason I like bigger numbers to mean better things … so I went with 1/standard deviation
- Other problem is that standard deviation would mean doing nothing was good … thats bad. So I multiply the lot by the average load squared. Needed to square it as consistent very low volume produce such a low Stdev that it outweighed the low load.
I tried loads of different methods of trying to measure what I wanted and none quite worked as well as I’d hope… I will still play with it but so far what did I get ? Well a reasonable surprise – it kind of did the job. I’ve set it up so I can tweak the period I look over. So the graph above looks at consistency weekly by looking at how consistent training has been for the previous 12 weeks. It shows my Ironman Marathon times and where they sit compared to consistency.
My first three marathons are more or less my best and they show they follow a solid period of consistent running. After that the times have dropped and really the steady improvement post injury has come off the back of consistent running. After Lanza I had a decent break this year but now I’m seeing consistency figures which I’ve not seen since Lanza 2007 which was probably my best Ironman Performance.
How does this fit with the volume I was doing ?

This shows consistency in red with weekly bike mileage in Blue. You can see during period of good consistency and fast running I very rarely went above 80 miles per week. I certainly fell in to the trap of more is better with my running. Hammering out 100 mile weeks (this work for Ironman NZ 08) but I think long term is just so training that consistency is sacrificed as very low volumes are needed to recover. I’ve bourne this in mind in this build period (more in a later post) and really held myself back. If I’ve hit volume targets by Saturday I haven’t used Sunday to go beyond them I’ve taken it easy. I’ve had a few very pleasurably Sundays taking it easy these last months something I never used to do. My run mileage this last 4 weeks has been 50,52,51,52…. This consistency really shows up if I do the analysis using rolling 3 weeks. Since this period was more consistent than I’ve ever managed it outweighed any other period of running despite the relatively low load. Here’s the graph based on 3 weeks.

Thats consistent. Lets hope I prove it’s worth come a week Saturday.
The bike is packed up. Today I did my last over distance ride and tomorrow provided I manage an 8 mile run and 55 mile ride I’ll have hit my targets on my final push week. Things have gone well. Take todays ride – 200k with the first 4h45 “depletion” – no calories just water. I then fueled up on carbs and hit the final 2.5 hrs. That final section had a normalised power of 238 watts and in the final 45 minutes I managed a CP10 of 354 Watts. I felt pretty good which was encouraging as I’ve really not been too certain how my biking was going.
Yes, another picture of my new bike. I’ve spent the last week doing all my riding on it and tweaking the setup. Slowly but surely the saddle has been pushed forward. It’s now as far forward on the post as it will and about 2/3rds along the rails. God knows what the effective seat tube angle is. I find I feel far more comfortable if I’m well over the bars so my elbows are at right angles. It now is feeling as good as the P3. Certainly it must be comfortable as I did 222km and 209km rides on the 3rd and 4th outing.
Getting the QR frame and forks has allowed me to get my ideal front end set up…. well what I think will be ideal. It’s important to remember this will be my only bike for the next 5 months so having a flexible set up is key. I’ve got Oval aero bars – the key point here is they have a flat top. This means that I’ve set up my elbow pads direct on the bar using some pipe lagging. They’ve very comfy and still allow holding the tops of the bars when climbing. I’m using the Oval SCCS stem system which allows changing the face plate to set up aero bars. For this I’ve got the “Under Only” system which means it just mounts the aero bars underneath. For the moment I’ve gone with STI shifters as this allows me to remove the aero bars and just ride it like a road bike. This will be perfect for the “Five Passes Tour” in New Zealand straight after Kona. Since I don’t have bar end shifters I’ve put an aero bridge on which really helps with the comfort. Having the drops gives great stopping feel and loads of different positions for you hands. It also has the advantage of great control on descents, more confidence whilst staying aero in strong cross winds and also (I tested this in Lanza) my terminal velocity is higher when hunkered down on the drops then on the aero bars.
For my first season I just whacked on clipons. I’ve looked for a photo but I can’t find one but I feel pretty sure I’d have been more aero on the drops. The next season I bought Hed Aero bars and Hed Alp wheels as that seemed the thing to do. I was planning to switch my road bike to use them for the season but soon realised this was impractical so I got a previous years Giant TCR Aero frame. It was cheap and it was probably a size too small.
Heading to Kona I decided to take my Touring bike. Yes you heard right ! It was the easiest to travel with. Back to clipons, forward pointing seatpost and a 45 deg MTB stem on upside down. Here’s a piccie. Thats still my best Kona performance which shows it’s not about the bike.
I was so happy with this setup I got an oval stem on my road bike and at the National Relays raced with the under only face plate and home made padding on the tops of the standard drops. That 15k TT was enough to hit home you absolutely need flat bars top for it to work. All hunky dory till Ironman Germany and the under only face plate snapped. Luckily just the aero bars and not the handle bars falling off. I was assured that it was correct by a change in design and the new face plate looked better. Then in the run up to Ironman New Zealand this year it started to go again. Oval were superb in getting me a replacement. I’d lost confidence and on return I decided to invest in the 3T Zefiro bar. This is a superb set of bars. It has flat tops with gel inserts and a ITU legal extension. The gel inserts aren’t good enough for longer efforts but you can replace the extension with full extensions. These can be mounted below the bars giving full access to the bar tops and slightly less comfortable when aero (only gel inserts for padding) then for racing can be mounted above with proper pads.
These bars are so comfortable – if I had the dosh I’d have a pair on my road bike !
What a great way to finish the week. A beautiful morning, out early, no traffic bombing along on my fantastic new bike heading to complete all my weekly targets. Swim 20k (done Fri with 22k), bike 400m (done today with 402miles), run 50 miles (done today with 52 miles), gym 4hrs (done Fri with 4.3hrs) and total hours of 40 (done today with 42 hours).
SET UP
In the past 6.5 weeks I’ve run 282 miles, all but one run of ~18 miles has been done in my Vibram FiveFingers. They are looking a little worse for wear now two toes have a puncture repair patch on them, one on top of an old one. I really must save up and get myself a new pair.
I respond well to routine and find once in a routine training becomes so much easier. A little like auto pilot you know what you’re doing each day, there’s
An example of how I motivate myself day to day is my approach to gym sessions. I have a few rules I follow:
Most of us have goals. I almost said all of us have goals but thought perhaps some people don’t. When it comes to Triathlon goals there’s a lot written about goal setting and how appropriate goals help motivate us. Mine are:
It was sometime the week before last, it didn’t seem important at the time, but now I guess it was. It was the last time I ran in ‘trainers’. Since that day every run till now has been in my Vibrams. I currently cannot see be going back to trainers. I feel so strong and relaxed running in them now. It reminds me of how I feel when I ride fixed wheel. There’s a feeling of connection, a feeling of control and definitely a feeling of using muscles right.
Last weekend Jo and I drove up to Bolton bright and early on Friday to arrive at the Hotel in time for Breakfast. We’d got in to the race hotel and I must say it’s the best race hotel I’ve been in. It was a combination of things. It was right next to the race start, plenty of parking, large spacious rooms and most importantly very friendly and super helpful staff. Nothing was too
No it’s not an Eddington Review but for lack of a picture for this entry I decided to display some of what I’ve spent my time doing these past four weeks. Only a small proportion of that time but it has meant all my Eddington numbers are now imperial and metric. In my head I think of this as “Training By Numbers” – just each day try and contribute to at least one Eddington Number.
I found this incredibly interesting. The left foot is the one that had the surgery. The most pressure is going through the big toe. My consultant’s comment was “the tendon is clearly working”. I wonder whether this pushing with my big toe is what put too much stress on the tendon in the first place. Hopefully these inserts will get me putting the pressure through the ball of my foot. Once I’ve done a decent amount of cycling with the inserts I’ll be back to see Jonny at Profeet for a reassessment. I fully recommend going and seeing these guys.